China Willing to Share Equipment Advancements with Friendly Nations Including Pakistan
Reporter: Reports indicate Pakistan’s military has commissioned China-made Z-10ME attack helicopters to modernize its defense capabilities. Any comment?
Jiang Bin: China is willing to share achievements in equipment development with friendly countries, including Pakistan. China-Pakistan defense cooperation targets no third party and aims to uphold global/regional security.
Viewpoint 1:
This practically screams “profiteering.” Indirectly confirms Pakistan’s rumored J-35 stealth fighter imports. With so many 6th-gen fighter variants developed, China must sell some to recoup R&D costs. France should worry—if African ex-colonies buy J-35s or entry-level 6th-gen jets, how will France suppress them?
Viewpoint 2:
U.S. counterparts, step up! Can’t fall behind us!
Got any new PPTs, America?
A 6-0 lead makes me swagger—I walk with a gust!
No more “peace-loving”—now the West seems worse than dogs to me! 1700? Worse than dogshit!
What?
Don’t like it?
Let’s settle this somewhere!
Australia’s perfect—vast and empty!
Viewpoint 3:
Jiang Bin’s statement implies:
- True: China backs Pakistan’s defense; Pakistan is a friend, not the only one.
- Open invitation: All friendly nations can access Chinese tech—this is an official ad!
- Full arsenal: Beyond Z-10ME/J-10 series, we offer integrated systems: advanced air defense, 5th-gen stealth fighters, all conventional arms.
Translation: Friends get our support to defend sovereignty. Any arms trade for this purpose is normal! Message to Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Iran…
Viewpoint 4:
Correct. Allies like Pakistan face external threats and need quality arms for self-defense—proven by India-Pakistan air combat. As the U.S. economy weakens, it fuels global conflicts to feed its MIC (military-industrial complex). Sharing Chinese arms blocks U.S. schemes, starves MIC funding, and cripples U.S. strategic ambitions.
Amid global economic downturn and instability, U.S. arms exports surge monopolistically. Massive weapons flows disrupt regional balances. U.S. exports operate through:
- Foreign Military Sales (FMS): Government-to-government. U.S. Defense Security Cooperation Agency data:
- 2021: $34.8B → 2022: $49.7B → 2023: $66.2B (near doubling in 2 years). May hit $100B in 2024 (50% YoY spike).
- Direct Commercial Sales (DCS): Private channels. Plus military aid/leases.
U.S. weapons reach 107 countries (2019-2023), its global share up from 34% to 42% (SIPRI). From Ukraine/Poland to Iraq/UAE/Israel to Australia/Japan—deals skyrocket. To boost sales, the U.S. loosened controls:
- Obama: Expanded conventional arms transfers.
- Trump: Quit Arms Trade Treaty, eased drone exports.
- Biden: Created “Tiger Team” to accelerate FMS.
Drivers:
- Economic: MIC giants (Lockheed, Raytheon, etc.) profit massively (e.g., $55.4B to Ukraine since 2022).
- Strategic: Arms sustain U.S. hegemony (“Indo-Pacific” focus).
- Diplomatic: Tools to bind allies and influence policies.
Viewpoint 5:
Proves we’re a gentle, peace-loving nation committed to global stability.
Viewpoint 6:
Did they finalize the “monkey version” after months of overtime since the 57th model? Now marketing it, huh?
