Amid Australia’s uproar over a hit-and-run case, Yang Lanlan casually posted $300M bail.
Chinese Netizens’ Views:
Viewpoint 1:
My high school/college classmates came from all over China, but those studying in the U.S. were all ultra-rich or powerful. Over time, we learned each other’s family backgrounds—especially Southerners/Shanghainese. Whether real estate tycoons, finance giants, or Forbes-listed billionaires, everyone’s origins got exposed.
Except Beijing kids. No one knew their real backgrounds. At best, we heard “their parents are high officials”—but how high? Who? Unknowable.
This pattern applies globally: when you can’t trace someone’s roots, you know which group they belong to.
Viewpoint 2:
Deliberately leaking absurd fake news (e.g., “$1.4T assets,” “$400B bail”) makes people doubt the entire narrative, hiding the truth within.
Miss Yang’s PR team is top-tier.
Viewpoint 3:
Question: Why can Aussie journalists freely interview Lanlan, but domestic reporters wouldn’t dare?
Viewpoint 4:
Why this case blew up:
- Lanlan Yang drove drunk + wrong-way, fled without reporting. Brought a friend back later—bystanders called police. Refused secondary sobriety test, bailed instantly.
- Victim: Luxury car dealer chauffeuring a famous radio host. Host publicly lambasted Yang’s refusal to cooperate + swift bail—local media frenzy followed.
- Yang dodged media/victims. Journalists dug—zero info found. Shifted to exposing “invisible rich heirs”: spend wildly but avoid public spaces, shop via proxies, no social media traces. Aussie headlines screamed: “WHO ARE THESE PEOPLE?!”
Trial: Aug 15. Thank foreign media—domestic press would’ve buried this.
Viewpoint 5:
Scary isn’t the money—it’s that she’s “unpersoned”!
Viewpoint 6:
This reminds me of Ne Zha:
Celestial Lord casually tosses 9,000 elixirs
while Shen Gongbao scrapes together 6 in 100 years.
As a kid, I dreamed of 1.4B people giving me ¥1 each. Turns out some take ¥1,000 from each.
Viewpoint 7:
Relax! Anyone named online isn’t top-tier “Celestial Dragons.”
- Canada: Four rich brats killed a single mom in Ford. Consulate intervened—names still unknown.
- Li Tianyi rape case: Five attackers, only Li’s name leaked—others vanished.
Viewpoint 8:
Massive trade surpluses yearly, yet forex reserves barely grow. Think.
Viewpoint 9:
We knew the Brahmin class was fat—but not this fat.
Viewpoint 10:
Predicted “debunking” playbook:
- Astroturfers exaggerate bail sum (e.g., “$400B!”).
- “Debunkers” dismiss: “Fake! Taiwan trolls photoshopped it!”
- Data pollution: Erase traces. Months later, truth unfindable.
Called “debunking via disinformation.” Shoutout to Bilibili’s “WhyLetWindBlow”—a stray dog patrolling villas it doesn’t own, barking to seem useful, hoping for scraps.
Viewpoint 11:
If official records “unperson” her, don’t blame wild rumors for twisting the tale.
Viewpoint 12:
Last month, U.S. House verbally passed: If Taiwan war erupts, expose “Celestial Dragons’” assets.
One Yang Lanlan shocks everyone—imagine thousands.
Viewpoint 13:
Fangchenggang + Jiangyou + Australia = China’s “Three New Mountains”:
- Rampant privilege
- No rights for the bottom
- Extreme wealth gap
Even if foreign forces manipulate, China’s core rot enables it. Foreign agitators avoid “800-self-damage-while-harming-1000-enemy” tactics. Example: They’ll push “democracy” in Serbia—safe, since Westerners see leaders change often. But never expose “Vucic’s son avoids jail”—that would make their own people ask: “Are we cowards?”
Viewpoint 14:
Aussie media found only:
- Custom Tiffany-blue Rolls-Royce
- White Rolls-Royce Ghost convertible
- Full Chanel fit (suspected DUI)
- Vancluse penthouse
Daily Mail headline: “Do You Know Lanlan Yang?”
Viewpoint 15:
When life feels heavy,
some mutt is “living the dream” on your back.